The report divides Springfield into 17 sectors. Suggestions are provided for each sector on how future development should proceed.
Here’s how to view the plan and provide feedback about it:
* It is available for review on the city’s website, and hardcopies are available at the Springfield City Clerk’s Office, 300 S. Seventh St.; Lincoln Library, 326 S. Seventh St.; and the Springfield-Sangamon County Regional Planning Commission, 200 S. Ninth St, Room 212 (Sangamon County Building).
* Public comments may be submitted via email to feedback@Springfield.il.us or in writing to the City of Springfield Mayor’s Office, 800 E. Monroe St., Room 300, Springfield, IL. 62701. The deadline to submit comments is Nov. 16.
* A public hearing will be held at 5:30 p.m. Nov. 16 in the Springfield City Council Chambers. After the hearing, the planning and zoning commission will make their final recommendation to the city council.
Location: Central Baptist Church-Fellowship Hall, 501 S. Fourth St.
Join Mayor Jim Langfelder and downtown Ward 2 Alderman Herman Senor at the upcoming 2017 Strategic Ward Planning meetings. These ward meetings will be facilitated by Benedictine University and serve as open forums where individuals and businesses can share their thoughts and views about the priorities for their specific wards while learning about city projects and initiatives. Residents who have questions about the forums may contact the Mayor’s Office at 217.789.2200.
Join Mayor Jim Langfelder and downtown Alderman Andrew Proctor at the upcoming 2017 Strategic Ward Planning meetings. These ward meetings will be facilitated by Benedictine University and serve as open forums where individuals and businesses can share their thoughts and views about the priorities for their specific wards while learning about city projects and initiatives. Residents who have questions about the forums may contact the Mayor’s Office at 217.789.2200.
Executive Director Lisa Clemmons Stott gave these remarks to the Springfield City Council this week.
The use of Central Area TIF funds to study whether one-way to two-way street conversion makes cents – as in cash registers ringing – is a prioritized use of TIF that aligns with DSI’s goals to increase foot traffic in the downtown district.
The Sustainable Design Assessment Team (SDAT) urban planners told us to reconsider our one-way grid back in 2012 when they encouraged us to stay focused on building a residential downtown. This is an interesting factoid they shared: “Customers who arrive by bicycle or foot spend less per retail visit, but make more frequent visits overall, which means that they spend more on an annual basis.” The kicker: “As many cities have discovered, the retail districts with the slowest speeds and highest congestion are often the most successful.”
We are not the first city to study one-way conversion and this is not a fly-by-night strategy. Cities around the country have reverted to their original two-way streets to increase economic impact in their downtowns.
Fewer collisions, less crime and higher property values
Traffic safety in the area improved even though the traffic volume increased
People were willing to exchange the slower speeds for more direct access to their destination
Crime rate actually decreased on two problem streets because more “eyeballs” on the street
In Lubbock, Texas, 86% of local business were in favor of more conversion after seeing the results of the first few completed streets because they credited it as one part of helping them experience growth after years of decline.
This is potentially one part of a larger downtown transportation solution that is needed–including signage analysis and wayfinding installation – and a parking app–and that is why conversion’s effect on parking is also a very important aspect of this study.
The process of neighborhood improvement is a very complex one with lots of variables. The downtown business community recommends a Yes vote to fund the initial conversion study.